Brand comparison
Anker SOLIX vs BLUETTI: which one is built for you?
These two brands are not competing for the same buyer. Anker SOLIX is optimised for the existing anker customer upgrading from power banks and chargers, while BLUETTI is optimised for the value-and-power buyer who does not mind a heavy box. Decide which of those you are, and the brand question answers itself before you compare a single spec.
The existing Anker customer upgrading from power banks and chargers
- Best for
- Buyers who want a well-made, well-supported unit and will use the app.
- Not for
- Off-gridders who need the widest accessory ecosystem or the lowest cost per Wh.
- Models tracked
- 10
The value-and-power buyer who does not mind a heavy box
- Best for
- Buyers who measure value in watts and watt-hours, not in grams and app screens.
- Not for
- Buyers who need the lightest possible unit or the simplest possible interface.
- Models tracked
- 17
Head to head on value
Average cost per watt-hour across each brand’s tracked range, and the winner in each capacity band. This is a value comparison only — it says nothing about support, app quality or build, which we cannot measure from a spec sheet.
| Measure | Anker SOLIX | BLUETTI |
|---|---|---|
| Average $/Wh across range | $1.00 | $0.65 |
| Models in dataset | 10 | 17 |
| LiFePO4 models | 10 | 16 |
| Largest capacity available | 3.84 kWh | 3.84 kWh |
Band by band
The cheapest option each brand offers in each capacity band. Where a brand has nothing in a band, that band is itself a useful signal.
All Anker SOLIX models
Anker SOLIX profile →| Model | Capacity | AC output | Weight | List price | $/Wh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C300 Anker SOLIX | 288 Wh | 300 W | 9.1 lb | $549 | $1.91 |
| C300X Anker SOLIX | 288 Wh | 300 W | — | $299.99 | $1.04 |
| C1000 Gen 2 Anker SOLIX | 1.02 kWh | 2 kW | 24.9 lb | $2,398 | $2.34 |
| C1000 Anker SOLIX | 1.06 kWh | 1.8 kW | 28.4 lb | $1,499 | $1.42 |
| S2000 Anker SOLIX | 2.01 kWh | 1.5 kW | 35.7 lb | $679 | $0.34 |
| C2000 Gen 2 Anker SOLIX | 2.05 kWh | 2.4 kW | 41.7 lb | $899.99 | $0.44 |
| F3000 Anker SOLIX | 3.07 kWh | 3.6 kW | 91.5 lb | $1,399.99 | $0.46 |
| F3000 2 Anker SOLIX | 3.07 kWh | 3.6 kW | 91.5 lb | $2,799.99 | $0.91 |
| F3800 Anker SOLIX | 3.84 kWh | 6 kW | 132.3 lb | $1,999.99 | $0.52 |
| F3800 Plus Anker SOLIX | 3.84 kWh | 6 kW | 72.8 lb | $2,399.99 | $0.62 |
All BLUETTI models
BLUETTI profile →| Model | Capacity | AC output | Weight | List price | $/Wh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elite 10 Mini BLUETTI | 128 Wh | 200 W | 4.0 lb | $113 | $0.88 |
| AC2A BLUETTI | 204 Wh | 300 W | 7.9 lb | $149 | $0.73 |
| EB3A BLUETTI | 268 Wh | 600 W | 10.1 lb | $219 | $0.82 |
| Elite 30 V2 BLUETTI | 288 Wh | 600 W | 9.5 lb | $249.99 | $0.87 |
| AC50B BLUETTI | 448 Wh | 700 W | 14.8 lb | $499 | $1.11 |
| EB70S BLUETTI | 716 Wh | 800 W | 21.4 lb | $429 | $0.60 |
| AC70 BLUETTI | 768 Wh | 1 kW | 22.5 lb | $669 | $0.87 |
| Elite 100 V2 BLUETTI | 1.02 kWh | 1.8 kW | 25.0 lb | $479 | $0.47 |
| AC180 BLUETTI | 1.15 kWh | 1.8 kW | 35.3 lb | $499 | $0.43 |
| AC180T BLUETTI | 1.43 kWh | 1.8 kW | 58.4 lb | $999 | $0.70 |
| AC240 BLUETTI | 1.54 kWh | 2.4 kW | 72.0 lb | $999 | $0.65 |
| AC200P BLUETTI | 2 kWh | 2 kW | 60.6 lb | $1,099 | $0.55 |
| AC200L BLUETTI | 2.05 kWh | 2.4 kW | 62.4 lb | $899 | $0.44 |
| Elite 200 V2 BLUETTI | 2.07 kWh | 2.6 kW | 53.4 lb | $849 | $0.41 |
| AC300 BLUETTI | 2.77 kWh | 3 kW | — | $2,299 | $0.83 |
| Elite 300 BLUETTI | 3.01 kWh | 2.4 kW | 58.0 lb | $1,099 | $0.36 |
| Elite 400 BLUETTI | 3.84 kWh | 2.6 kW | 86.0 lb | $1,299 | $0.34 |
What each brand will not tell you
Anker SOLIX’s known weaknesses
- Newer to the category than the camping incumbents
- Smaller range than EcoFlow or BLUETTI, with fewer off-grid accessories
- Pricing is not the value play — the premium is for polish
- Less field-proven in hard off-grid use
BLUETTI’s known weaknesses
- Weight and bulk — these are not carry-it-to-the-beach units
- Fit, finish and industrial design lag the lifestyle brands
- App and firmware polish is inconsistent across the range
- Support and returns are a frequent criticism in independent coverage